All posts by UnknownProdigy

Ok, I'm not one to start forums, but this is bugging me. I have noticed recently quite a few random blog posts have surfaced (not that I have anything wrong with that). I've noticed that other wikis have blog post guidlines. I just wanted to put forward the idea of blog post guidelines. MLP wiki has two that wouldn't be too hard to follow

1. Is it relvant to the Wiki

2. Or is it relevant to the general topic of the Wiki

Also, something else. We seem to decide things by waiting for Flutterbutter to decide. I know that he is the founder, but other wikis don't have to rely on their founder to make decisions. So I'm going to bring forward something that may help in this regard.

-Forums will be discussed for 7 days, and then we see how much support or oppostion their is and that will be the deciding factor.

Thank you for your time, UP, out.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to Flutterbutter

UnknownProdigy·4/23/2014

I think personal matters between a few people should be on Talk Pages, while things concerning the entire wiki should be on forums.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to Cherrypop888

UnknownProdigy·4/13/2014

Aiight, I can supervise over Games too.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to Cherrypop888

UnknownProdigy·4/13/2014

Well, Guitar we could assign some to do gaming, as we haven't given anyone the job yet.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to Cherrypop888

UnknownProdigy·4/13/2014

Check leadership guitar, and you don't need that many periods Clover

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to Cherrypop888

UnknownProdigy·4/8/2014

But yes we do need to be getting back to editing everyone. I've been rather busy lately so that's why I haven't been around much.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to Cherrypop888

UnknownProdigy·4/8/2014

UP sucks at remembering wikis exist.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to UnknownProdigy

UnknownProdigy·3/17/2014

True, but admins on other wikis rarely get on chat too sometimes, but still edit constantly. Also Bmon is admin because he got most of the code working and if we have issues with it we need him to help out with it.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to UnknownProdigy

UnknownProdigy·3/17/2014

Cherrypop888 wrote:

UnknownProdigy wrote:
Anyway I would have too say if that admin is inactive for a month without a good excuse or something that admin should be demoted. I would say that Velvet Remedy as he only has one edit and has not been active.

What i wanted to ask, Who was the inactive admin?

As I just said Velvet and maybe a few others.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to UnknownProdigy

UnknownProdigy·3/17/2014

Anyway I would have too say if that admin is inactive for a month without a good excuse or something that admin should be demoted. I would say that Velvet Remedy as he only has one edit and has not been active.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to UnknownProdigy

UnknownProdigy·3/14/2014

I didn't say block them. I just thought we should demote them, since we need active users as admins.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

UnknownProdigy·3/14/2014 in General Discussion

Inactive Admins

I believe that we need to slim down some of the admins, as some are no longer active on the wiki that much. If you don't believe jsut check the User list and see how many edits some people have. I think we should put forward the idea of revoking the rights on some inactive admins.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to Cherrypop888

UnknownProdigy·3/8/2014

Already did it.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)

A reply to Cherrypop888

UnknownProdigy·3/8/2014

meh he was kicking people and exploting his rights, he has every reason to have his rights revoked so he doesn;t come back and we have to deal with this problem all over again.

(Edited by UnknownProdigy)